SKU: 38907885597

Digital Antenna 883-CW 4 Cellular Antenna - White [883-CW]

Name: Digital Antenna 883-CW 4 Cellular Antenna - White [883-CW]
Brand: mayerfrank
SKU: 38907885597
Price: 183.00 USD
Availability: InStock
Rating: 4.5859000000000005 (440 reviews)

$164.70 $183.00

Save 10%

No.2 Bestseller on mayerfrank >

Pay in installments of $45.75 with , and

Shipping Estimate
USA

USA

CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jun 12 - Jun 17

Description

Digital Antenna 883-CW 4 Cellular Antenna - White [883-CW]4' Cellular Antennas 9dB Gain, Dual Band Digital Antenna's dual band cellular antennas improve signals on cellular (824 894 MHz) and PCS (1850 1990 MHz) bands. They are omni directional, transmitting and receiving signals from all directions, which provides you with 10 times the signal strength of a cell phone used by itself. With a powerful 9dB gain and professional marine grade construction, these 4' cellular antennas deliver high performance that

Shipping Notes

Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
Delivery to the USA:

Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days

If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.

Exchange/Return Notes

We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

Best in 7 days

Moon Garden Pillow | Pewter

US$ 170.00

Sold : Login>>

Best in 7 days

Cannon 10lb Flash Weight [2295184]

US$ 70.99

Sold : Login>>

Best in 7 days

Horst Stripe Pillow | Grisaille

US$ 140.00

Sold : Login>>

Best in 7 days

Castanet Embroidery Pillow | Cobalt

US$ 170.00

Sold : Login>>

Best in 7 days

Blue Sea 8256 AC Current Transformer [8256]

US$ 24.99

Sold : Login>>

Sort

Product Reviews

Verified Purchase

Barbara Arms

Massapequa, US

★★★★★ 5

Change is not always better.

Love these. Smooth fabric and moist enough. Used to buy the regular ones. They changed the fabric to a rough texture. Pulls on the skin and not as efficient.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on January 3, 2026

Verified Purchase

nanny america

Port Orchard, US

★★★★★ 5

Did the job!

This worked really well...I use one pad for both eyes so these will last a while ...

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on April 26, 2026

Verified Purchase

Jan

Grantham, US

★★★★★ 1

Awful product

These are terribly greasy, causing blurry vision. The first ingredient is mineral oil! Prior to ordering I searched the listing for the ingredients list and found nothing. I went to the product's website and still found nothing. I read reviews, which were mixed. I ordered them anyway, foolishly, and threw them in the trash.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on May 25, 2026

Verified Purchase

VickiB

San Leandro, US

★★★★★ 5

Works on waterproof Mascara

These are great for removing all makeup even waterproof, leaves my eyes moisturized.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on March 20, 2026

Verified Purchase

catteeth

Port Orchard, US

★★★★★ 4

Gentle and effective

I've been using these pads a loooong time. They take off everything and are not irritating at all (my skin is super sensitive). However they WILL leave an oily residue on your skin causing your makeup to spread around your face a bit. I don't mind this since I'd rather be over moisturized than dry. Nothing a little Cetaphil can't conquer post eye makeup removal. I've since switched to Bioderma Crealine which lives up to all the hype. It takes ALL my makeup off without leaving any residue. I still use the EyeQ pads for heavy duty mascara and traveling since they are compact and cut down on the amount of stuff I need to carry.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on September 26, 2013